|Tea For Two|
If a government is large enough to give you everything what you want
it is large enough to take everything you have.
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance,
and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
|Welcome, anonymous (Log in)|
Can the Justice Department be considered to be obstructing justice?
Posted by Bob Tuesday, 2017-December-05
What would happen if Pres. Trump ordered the FBI and the Department of Justice to fully cooperate with congressional investigations currently ongoing regarding Russian collusion?
Can the Justice Department be considered to be obstructing justice if they fail to comply with the congressional subpoena? When a member of the Justice Department is cited for contempt of Congress, is that a firing offense? Should Donald Trump order the Justice Department and FBI to fully comply with all request given to them by congressional committees investigating matters that interfered with the last election, including missing emails, and information gathered on pay to play operations by the Clinton crime family?
Special Counsel Robert Mueller Leaks
Posted by Mr Tea Saturday, 2017-October-28
CNN came out with some leaked information from the special counsel Robert Mueller's office. This leak is obviously for the purpose of muddying up the waters with the recent revelations of the Clintons involvement with Russia and $9,000,000 paid to the Russians for the purpose of trashing Donald Trump. A leak like this in itself is problematic, especially when it is done for political purposes.
It is time for special counsel Robert Mueller to resign from office or at least recuse himself from this Russian investigation. Being as we now know that Robert Mueller and company were involved in the Russian collusion for profit scam.
There's been much made concerning an unnamed Republican who is also involved in the Steel dossier, eventually this person's name will be made public and he or she should face some kind of repercussions for his actions.
Why do people go to sporting events?
Posted by taxbilly Saturday, 2017-September-23
Why do people go to sporting events? Is it to see multimillionaires spit on the country's flag and disrespect those who give them the right for peaceful protest? These super rich protesters are complaining about the society that made them wealthy. They are complaining about the people who keep them safe and risk their lives so they may enjoy their First Amendment rights.
When anyone complains about the spectacle on the field during the national anthem the retort is, "it is our First Amendment right to protest against abuse". And this is true but am I expected to pay you to watch you do this? Is it my responsibility and obligation to show up at your games and pay your entry fee, or to buy your memorabilia at exorbitant prices? And is it the responsibility of your employer and the NFL to give you the time and the platform to make your political statements? The stadium is no place for a dialogue concerning your complaints, because the dialogue can only go in one direction in that situation and, disrespecting the American flag and the men and women that fought for that flag is not a dialogue.
Maybe it's time that people quit wasting their money on a bunch of overpaid inconsiderate self-centered idiots, and find themselves another form of entertainment that doesn't require listening to some spoonfed mama's boy complain about how tough life is.
I for one am not coming to any more of your games, and that includes watching on television, until the NFL cleans up its act and quits forcing me to sit through this sad display of anti-Americanism and the hatred shown for those that have given their lives for these punks.
What is the true numbers on DACA? (THE LIE)
Posted by Mr Tea Friday, 2017-September-15
The backers of the dreamers act claim that 800,000 children would be granted residency which would later lead to citizenship if the new bill the Democrats are proposing passes. When they defined the dreamers they say that it is children who were brought across the border unwillingly by their parents. The argument is to deport them would break up the family and that these children do not know anything but the American life. So for no fault of their own we should allow them to stay, what they aren't saying is that their parents are here in this country and will also be allowed to stay. And this also allows the family to bring across the border legally other close family members. The numbers have been estimated to being close to 11 million new Democratic voters, not 800,000.
What we are doing is rewarding the parents for illegally entering the country with their children and having them educated in American schools on taxpayer money.
The compassionate thing to do would be to keep families together and send him back to the original country where they can teach the countries of their origin on the American way of life that they value so highly.
President Donald Trump slept last night as Americans died
Posted by Mr Tea Sunday, 2017-August-27
President Donald Trump slept last night, apparently unaware that millions of Americans were being flooded out of their homes and losing all of their possessions. Is it possible that Donald Trump’s staff is shielding him from the death and pain coming from global warming catastrophes such as this? How could anybody sleep so soundly knowing of the destruction and death was occurring in his own homeland. Where was the government to stop this carnage from occurring, and why don’t they do something to stop this downpour before every house in America is underwater?
John McCain the war hero
Posted by Fat Friday, 2017-July-28
Everybody likes to refer to John McCain as a war hero. The press is very good at this, John McCain becomes the, "maverick" and throws a monkey wrench into any conservative legislation that may be going through the Senate. He becomes praised and if anybody speaks out against him he is reminded that John McCain is a war hero.
I would like to remind the press Benedict Arnold was also a war hero, until he was a traitor. John McCain is put himself before the country, both a matter of pride.
Bill Paid $500,000 for Moscow Speech While Hillary Opposed Russia Sanctions
Posted by taxbilly Tuesday, 2017-July-18
A new Fox News report indicates that Mrs. Clinton and the lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, shared mutual opposition to sanctions against Russia in 2010. Veselnitskaya’s opposition seems self-explanatory, as her interests clearly were in benefiting her country.
But Clinton’s became a curiosity based on the fact that her husband, former president Bill Clinton, had given a paid speech in Moscow around that time – to the tune of $500,000.
click here for youtube
Previous page | Next page
Bloly v1.3 by SoftCab Inc