Tea For Two

If a government is large enough to give you everything what you want

it is large enough to take everything you have.

-Davy Crockett

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance,

and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

-Winston Churchill

Welcome, anonymous (Log in)   RSS Newsfeed
Why change the definition of marriage when all you have to do is make a simple change in the tax codes? Subscribe to comments to this posting
Posted by taxbilly   •   Friday, 2013-April-05
Is this whole thing about DOMA a red herring?
Can't the same results that the parties are seeking in the Supreme Court decision be much easier accomplished by a simple tax code change?

From what I understand in the lawsuit, a lesbian couple that was married in Canada moved down to United States. When one of the lesbians died the remaining lesbian could not get the tax benefit that she could have gotten if the marriage was recognized by the federal government. In other words this woman had to pay her fair share of her great wealth.

The truth of the matter is this is not about equal rights, it is about making deviancy the norm and acceptable to those that believe in the laws of God. The idea here is that if you are doing something under the umbrella of marriage, it cannot be considered sinful or unacceptable to God. The truth of the matter is a simple change in the tax code would completely alleviate the stated grievances given for the reasons for calling same-sex unions, "marriage".
    Post reply
    Your email
    Your password
    Preview
    <December>  <2017>
    SUMOTUWETRFRSA
         12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31      

    Archive
    August,2015 [4]
    October,2013 [10]
    September,2013 [10]
    July,2013 [15]
    June,2013 [15]
    May,2013 [8]
    April,2013 [7]
    March,2013 [10]
    February,2013 [5]
    January,2013 [13]
    December,2012 [17]
    November,2012 [19]

    Search

    Bloly v1.3 by SoftCab Inc